PIP Implants- What should you do?

PIP IMPLANTS – WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?

 

This weekend saw a further National Press announcement regarding the PIP implant scandal. This follows on from recent press interest in the situation. The Times recently featured an article about Rachel Jacomb who is suing her private clinic for refusing to remove her breast implants free of charge. It is now estimated that she is one of 45,000 women in Britain who have received implants manufactured by the now defunct French Company Poly Implant Prosthese.

Unfortunately although many of the governments in Europe have concluded that these implants are dangerous the UK government does not agree. Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, says that the experts advising him have found no evidence to recommend their early removal.

The NHS has, however,  confirmed they will remove and replace the implants without charge if patients, the NHS had operated, on remained concerned. This however only covers a small fraction of the women in Britain who have had PIP implants (6.65%)

The government expects the private sector to follow suit but what do the 93.35% of women do if they do not?

What should I do if I have concerns about my implants?

As with all surgery there is a risk and no doubt those firms who carried out the surgery provided their clients with details of those risks. It is, however, unlikely that these risks included the use of non-medical grade silicone which could cause injury if the implants leaked.

If you have concerns about your Breast Implants the first step is to find out if the implants are PIP implants. You can obtain this information from the supplier or the clinic where the surgery was carried out.

If you find out you do have PIP implants contact your GP or the clinic where the operation took place and ask for a scan so they can assess whether the implants pose any risk to your health. If the scan shows there is a risk then speak to the clinic about having them removed. If the scan shows there is no risk you will have to decide whether you want them removed in any event or whether to monitor them to see if a problem arises

If you have received PIP Implants and still have concerns you should contact either the NHS or the firm that carried out the surgery. Many of the firms such as Harley Medical Group or the Transform Medical Group have patient advice and information available on their websites.

How can Nockolds help?

If after speaking to the medical professionals mentioned above you remain concerned about your implants please contact Nockolds for a free no obligation consultation. As part of our “Looking After You” campaign we believe the people in Hertfordshire and Essex need a local solicitor who is prepared to treat them as an individual. We will discuss with you whether you might be entitled to compensation and if you are we will act on a “no win no fee” basis thus ensuring you receive 100% of any compensation which you are awarded. We will also advise you whether or not to pursue a claim as we realise that compensation is not always the best result for all of our clients.

For further information or to contact our dedicated Medical Negligence team please call Jennie Jones or Ivan Moody on 01279 755777.

 

 

Ivan Moody (profile) Ivan MoodyJennie Jones (profile) Jennie Jones Monday 19th March 2012
Looking After You stories
Personal Injury & Accident stories

Whiplash – Fact or Fiction?

The figures in relation to Whiplash claims do seem incredible but although the press are happy to sensationalise our “Compensation Culture” there are two sides to every story. David Cameron is meeting today (14th February 2012) with insurance, consumer and business groups to discuss what can be done. 

BBC News - David Cameron pledges action to cut car whiplash claims

The vast majority of people who claim for whiplash have genuine injuries. They have, in many cases, been innocent passengers or drivers whose vehicle has been hit from behind by a careless driver. Should that driver (who is often clearly at fault) be allowed to get away with his negligent action? The Insurance industry states that if a vehicle is travelling at less than 6.25mph then the claim will fail. The problem with this argument is we are all built differently and some of us can withstand greater impacts than others.

If the 6.25mph limit is implemented who will be who is responsible for proving the speed at impact? Will it be open for a Defendant to simply say that they were travelling at less than 6.25mph and leave the claimant to obtain expensive expert evidence to prove otherwise?

There are clearly a number of fraudulent whiplash claims and they need to be weeded out but the vast majority of Claimants have legitimate injuries and the government is in danger of unfairly punishing them.

What is the answer?

The suggestion of a panel of approved court experts is a good one providing Defendants and Claimants can agree who should be on the list. A number of years ago APIL (The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers) and FOIL (The Federation of Insurance Lawyers) managed to produce a list of agreed Orthopaedic Experts and surely they could meet again and produce a similar list for Whiplash Injuries.

For more detail on Whiplash Claims see Jennie Jones’ article of 12th January 2012 Whiplash claims...scandal or a right to claim

Ivan Moody is a solicitor at Nockolds LLP with over 20 years’ experience of Road Traffic and other Personal Injury Claims

For help and advice contact the team on accidents@nockolds.co.uk

 

 

Ivan Moody (profile) Ivan MoodyJennie Jones (profile) Jennie JonesRachel Davis (profile) Rachel Davis Tuesday 14th February 2012
Looking After You stories
Nockolds LLP stories
Personal Injury & Accident stories

Whiplash claims...scandal or a right to claim

Whiplash claims...scandal or a right to claim

The headlines and discussions in the media suggest that these claims are a way of gaining “easy money” and that insurance companies pay out automatically.  Cutting through the hype and innuendo, it should be made clear that in order to succeed with a personal injury claim for whiplash or any injury, the injured person needs to prove that the other driver was at fault i.e ‘negligent’.  If this can be proved then they are entitled to compensation for the injury suffered.  

Over recent years, the insurance industry has lobbied hard for a revised process to deal with low value road traffic accidents.  An on-line process is now in place. Insurers will often press for a General Practitioner’s report to be obtained to prove the injury rather than a more expensive neck and spine expert, such as Orthopaedic Surgeon. The medical experts instructed owe a duty to the Court to be independent. They are not ‘hired guns’. If properly instructed by a qualified, experienced, personal injury lawyer, the medical expert will be asked to review the person’s medical history and comment on whether the accident has caused an injury or that there are other causes for the injured persons pain and discomfort.

If an injured person suffers for only a few weeks, then the claim is unlikely to be taken any further. In order to recover legal costs, the claim must be worth more than £1,000.00.  Under the Court guidelines the reality is that unless an injury is suffered for 2-3 months, this level of compensation would not be awarded.  If an injured person has instructed a solicitor or has been referred to a solicitor by their insurance company, which is often the case, then they would be personally responsible for the legal fees.

Whilst some whiplash claims do involve a relatively short to medium term injury which may need some physiotherapy or other treatment, there are occasions when even a relatively minor accident can have a devastating effect on someone’s life.  For someone with a vulnerable back or with a pre-existing problem, even an accident at a slow speed can cause devastating injuries, or accelerate the problems experienced.  In the past Nockolds have dealt with a case where a person was involved in a relatively minor rear end shunt. The solicitor instructed by her insurer initial dealt with this as a minor 6 month whiplash injury. She did not recover within 6 months and decided to seek a second opinion from Nockolds. When we investigated further, the medical evidence found that due to a pre-existing problem with her back and neck, the accident made her symptoms at least 200% more severe, and had the accident not occurred, these symptoms would not have materialised for another 15 years.  Unfortunately due to the severity of her injury, our client was unable to continue working as a trainer for vulnerable adults with learning difficulties.  Having loved her job for more than 20 years, this affected her emotionally and psychologically. The medical evidence of two Consultants confirmed the accident had significantly altered the likely progression of her back problem, and therefore she was entitled to recover compensation for this and for the impact it  had on her ability to work. The claim was resolved and compensation (including loss of earnings) received just two months before her mortgage company were due to take the final steps to repossess her home. So whilst on the face of it, whiplash claims can be trivial, this is not always true and without proper investigation injustice will arise.

The insurance industry are suggesting that on one hand, expert legal representation is not required, but then arguing that these injuries should be fully proved and tested. 

Former Justice Minister Jack Straw was heard on Radio 4 Today programme, speaking about referral fees. These fees have clouded the impression of independence on both sides.  Insurers have sold on peoples’ details following the reporting of an accident, in return for a fee paid by the solicitors or claims management companies. Despite the strict professional codes of conduct, and even where solicitors are meeting their obligations to their clients, there is a suspicion that independence is lost. 

Jennie Jones of Nockolds LLP explained that “our independence is key and we took the decision, as a firm, not to pay referral fees for personal injury claims. We have criticised insurance companies for making money from selling on their customers information and for them encouraging people to make claims when their injuries may not be severe enough for them to consider taking this action themselves.  We are committed to providing those injured in accidents with honest and clear advice as to whether they have a claim, and if so, whether it is a claim worth pursuing. This advice should not be tainted in any way by clients’ fears that there are links with the other parties insurer, their own insurance company or another interested party.  Reputable and experienced personal injury lawyers will investigate claims and will consider whether the injured person can justify bringing a claim whether their injury is severe enough:

  1. to warrant compensation above the small claims limit;
  2. incurring the legal costs of doing so;
  3. to cause financial implications such as loss of earnings or the need for care. 

Compensation is not paid out automatically and an injured person has to overcome a number of hurdles before their claim is successful and they recover compensation. It is very difficult for an individual who has not been through the process before to deal with the might of a multinational insurance company whose aim is to pay as little as possible and take their shareholders interest.”

Injured people with genuine claims need representation and accurate, honest advice as to whether to pursue a claim in the first place. Without this experienced advice, claims may not be handled and resolved fairly (either for the injured person or society as a whole, in terms of insurance premiums).

Following a review and consultation during 2010 and 2011, the Government has put forward various proposals and reforms to the personal injury claims system and these are currently being debated in the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment for Offenders Bill, which is being considered in detail by Parliamentary Committees.  It is likely that referral fees will be banned, and other changes made to how the legal costs of claiming, and personal injury claims are recovered.  These will significantly change the personal injury landscape and it is yet to be seen whether this will be to the detriment of those who have genuine claims and a right to compensated.

If you would like to discuss an injury claim, or the claims process generally, please contact Jennie Jones on 01279 712537 or email accidents@nockolds.co.uk.

 

Jennie Jones (profile) Jennie Jones Thursday 12th January 2012
Looking After You stories
Personal Injury & Accident stories

Legal 500 success

Following the release of the 2011 edition of the Legal 500 on 24 September, Nockolds are delighted and proud to announce that for the 5th consecutive year the Firm has been included as a "Leading Firm" of solicitors in the UK. Yet again, the Firm is considered to be a ‘Recommended’ Firm in 7 categories:

Commercial Property
Agriculture
Employment
Corporate Commercial
Family
Tax, trusts & probate
Accident & Injury – claimant insurance claims

The inclusion of the Firm in so many categories by the Legal 500 is excellent news!

The Legal 500, along with the Chambers and Partners directory is in effect the Who’s Who in the legal profession. It is based on research and feedback entirely from clients, other solicitors & barristers and therefore it is a fantastic achievement that Nockolds LLP are so highly regarded in the legal profession.

We would like to thank all clients and others who gave us testimonials and spoke to the researchers.

Darren Hayward (profile) Darren HaywardJennie Jones (profile) Jennie Jones Wednesday 5th October 2011
Nockolds LLP stories

Crawley care home staff arrested over neglect

The BBC reported today of the Care Home Staff arrested over suspicions of neglect at the Southern Cross Home specialising in Dementia Care.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15182300

But what do you do if you suspect neglect?

The first step should always be to report it. If the abuse is taking place in a care home inform their senior management. If this does not allay your concerns speak to a GP or nurse or other trusted medical professional.


What do you do if the abuse continues? It is always advisable to keep a diary of your concerns and if physical injuries are involved take photographs. This is the best evidence of injuries occurring and will be invaluable to your solicitor if it becomes necessary to consider legal proceedings. There are also a number of other bodies to whom you can report your concerns including Action on Elder Abuse, the Local Authority and the Police.


At Nockolds we offer a free confidential no obligation initial consultation for all those who have suffered from abuse or have family who have suffered from abuse. We appreciate this can be a difficult issue to discuss and that you may prefer to do this in your own home. Nockolds’ staff are happy to travel to see their clients and will not insist that the client comes to them.

For more information please contact Jennie Jones or Ivan Moody to arrange an appointment.

Ivan Moody (profile) Ivan MoodyJennie Jones (profile) Jennie Jones Wednesday 5th October 2011
Personal Injury & Accident stories

Latest Entires

Departments

Months

Authors

Tags

Subscribe